The Student Government Association (SGA) of the University of Massachusetts-Amherst (UMass) proposed and passed on Friday a resolution which "reaffirmed" its previous endorsement of the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel just a few days after Jews and Israelis marked the one-year anniversary of Hamas's Oct. 7 attacks on the Jewish state.
"Be it further resolved, that the UMass Amherst Student Government Association University Undergraduate Senate continues to urge the UMass Amherst administration, board of trustees, and UMass Foundation to divest from all direct and indirect financial investments and official university partnerships with Raytheon and other defense contractors, all corporations affiliated with Israel Defense Forces, and entities on the BDS list," the resolution said.
It continued, "Undergraduate Senate continues to affirm the rights of students to protest and make demands of UMass administration and affirms that any talks or implementation surrounding divestment should include democratic oversight from faculty, students, and staff."
The measure, titled "The Reaffirmation," also contained spoils for anti-Zionist and pro-Hamas fellow travelers, imploring the university, for example, to drop disciplinary charges filed against students who last semester lived illegally in a "Gaza solidarity encampment" site from which they refused to leave unless administrators complied with their demands for a boycott of Israel.
Coinciding with mass mourning of the Oct. 7 victims, the resolution reopened old wounds, a UMass student -- Aviva, who has requested that her last name be withheld from this article -- told The Algemeiner. She also argued that, having taken place on Shabbat, the resolution seemed to reveal the intention of its sponsors to exclude Jews from the debate.
"We see time and time again that student governments around the country basically put these votes up on nights such as Shabbat or other holidays when they know the Jewish students cannot show up and that, if they did, their argument would not withstand rigorous debate," Aviva said, noting that many Jewish students did eventually decide to attend the SGA session. "And we saw that the other night, that there were so many holes in their argument that they were unable to confidently answer many questions both from senators and community members who supported the reaffirmation and who did not."
A palpable tension choked the air in the room once the senators realized they would have to see in person a people they had contrived to treat as board game pieces, she continued. Forced to discuss the matter at hand with an audience comprising more dissenters than anticipated, some SGA members defended themselves, arguing that the session was, at its core, a performance -- a pantomime of resistance against corporate power which would bear little on decisions rendered by the trustees who mange the university's endowment.
Others claimed, falsely, that it was necessary because UMass's investments are heavily concentrated in Israeli businesses and others linked to it. However, whether the vote was a performance or not, its happening so soon after the Oct. 7 anniversary, and on Shabbat, indicated that SGA had chosen Jews and Zionists as its target audience, Aviva explained.
"They don't mention any other countries [besides Israel]. To me, that's blatant antisemitism. Another problem is that the concerns of Jewish students were brutally disregarded during the question and answer portion of the session," Aviva continued. "One Jewish student stood up and said that she had experienced an assault on campus and asked the members of Senate who supported the resolution what they would do to protect Jewish students on campus, to which he responded something like, 'I'm more worried about Jewish students who were mistreated by cops.'"
The hearing went on in this way, according to Aviva, with the anti-Zionist senators accusing Israel of crimes against humanity while imposing their opinions about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on Jewish students as established facts. At some point, SGA president Colin Humphries said that his earlier call to be "respectful of one another" -- as quoted by The Massachusetts Daily Collegian -- had been ignored and that their militancy had cut deep. A Jewish senator, he noticed, exuded distress, causing him to walk to where she sat and console her.
"They were snickering and making fun of people," Aviva said. "The president, as well as vice president, of SGA has supported more than a few questionable ideas during his tenure, taking stances that don't really make sense, but it was telling that he felt so nervous in that room that he needed to move to the back of the room to protect a Jewish student. That really shows that this isn't a safe campus environment, a president feeling nervous and scared for one of his legislators."
Ultimately, the anti-Zionist caucus of UMass SGA notched yet another legislative victory. The "reaffirmation" passed overwhelmingly and will be forwarded to the university's leadership. Aviva believes, however, that SGA can still be a force for good and that one ingredient of reforming it is increased Jewish representation.
"This reaffirmation was so painful because Jewish senators were in the process of talking about ways to build bridges, to build community within SGA and between the larger campus student body," she said. "That being said, I think SGA has the power to really bring people together. Electing more Jewish senators and chairs of different committees would be an amazing start."